Lynda Mahabir
-
MDO product level feedback (submitted on behalf of FRP-Kraft Kennedy)
Engineering feedback: Difficult to get customers to rip and replace existing solution because combined with EXO, protection is viewed as inferior.Delivery Feedback: EXO/MDO combination needs to be at par with competing solutions.Sales Feedback:Lots of Competition. Tough to get them to rip and replace solutions that are deemed superior to EXO/MDO combination. Even if included in M365 plan. -
MIP/Purview IP product level feedback (submitted on behalf of FRP-Kraft Kennedy)
Delivery and Sales feedback: Purview = lack of MSFT-led use cases for legal (vertical). -
IRM product level feedback (submitted on behalf of FRP-Kraft Kennedy)
Feedback for Engineering: Policies can be added easilyFeedback from Sales: Sales/Marketing Problem- not enough exposure and product awareness being put out there. -
Teams Phone product level feedback (submitted on behalf of FRP-Kraft Kennedy)
Feedback for Engineering: EmergingFeedback from Delivery: All good with cloud delivered phone concept until we get to Conference Rooms. There is too much complexity here.Feedback from Sales: All good with cloud delivered phone concept until we get to Conference Rooms. There is too much complexity here. Customers spend big $$$ on Conference Room equipment and Sales is unsure how to justify moving to Teams Phones System and conversation.
-
Viva product level feedback (submitted on behalf of FRP-Kraft Kennedy)
For Engineering: No demand: Legal customers are still on premise /Unfamiliar with the valueFrom Delivery: Unfamiliar with valueFrom Sales: Low/no demand: Legal customers are still on premise. Unsure of the value and who to speak to about Viva- Possibly unsure about included workloads in M365 plan -
RFA program feedback (submitted on behalf of FRP-Kraft Kennedy)
We have not seen a single referral to us that had an incentive behind it in our 2 years with the program. We have only had one non-customer referral that actually responded to our reply and despite being told by FastTrack that the educational institution was indeed eligible for partner incentive (we asked because we knew they were not), we found out after executing the benefit that no incentive would be paid. For the referrals coming from existing customers, it is obvious that Microsoft Sales teams (or CSAs in particular) just point everything to FastTrack partner for free work even when situations are clearly not FastTrack eligible. Microsoft is burdening partners since their technical teams continue to be less and less useful. The FastTrack team seems to be co-conspirators in this operation and seem to not want to protect their partners any more than the balance of the Microsoft program. -
CPOR program feedback (submitted on behalf of FRP-Kraft Kennedy)
There is no discernible protection for a partner after you provide the benefit. If we execute a justification exercise for SCI, or migrating to Teams or Intune, we should be able to maintain the customer association for a period of time. We are being usurped by LARs as the Partner Center criteria for picking between contested associations is a mystery and decided by uneducated, non-Microsoft employees. Partner Support is terrible, staffed by a team that has no clue what they are doing or how partners need Partner Center. -
Viva product level feedback (submitted on behalf of FRP-ProserveIT)
- Are your Delivery teams ramped up to deliver Viva modules? Yes, PSIT offers Viva Academy. Plans to leverage MCI, Wizards, QTM’s where applicable.
- Are you making CPOR claims for Viva? Not yet
- Do you have the right resources in place internally and do you need tech go to from Microsoft ( SME’s) yes internal, now need Microsoft Resources. (note: I have since provided Angel Vargas and his team as resources)
- Any Product level feedback for our engineering team? Not yet
- Delivery: Any blockers from a product perspective or challenges around FastTrack motion for delivering Viva? Anything to be tweaked or fixed to make it easier to sell/deploy more? Possibly Licensing. Customers unaware that Viva workloads are including in their current M365 plans.
- Sales: Any blockers in articulating the value? Any customer pushback in value/approving budget? Is it too expensive? Why does the customer not have intent? Sales/Customers unaware that Viva workloads are including in their current M365 plans.