Share FRP program tools and Reporting feature requests, suggestions, ideas, and insights/feedback.
Please submit all support and access issues to https://aka.ms/PXPartnerSupport.

  • 2

    Ability to see Claim ID on the FRP Dashboard reports.

    Suggested by Sebastian Baca – Needs Votes  – 2 Comments

    Claim IDs are not visible in the PowerBI FRP Dashboard. 
    The dashboard is a great tool; however it lacks the Claim ID which is as important in order to fully reconcile the registrations. 
     

  • 2

    Provide reports for Badges acquired.

    Suggested by Adriana Blue – Completed  – 2 Comments

    Hello,
    I would like to request a report to view my organization users that acquired a sales or Tech badges around Teams rooms and meetings. This will allow us to track and ensure we meet the program requirements around badges.

  • 2

    FCU features - Partner Contact from CPOR claim

    Suggested by Jami Styx – Accepted  – 3 Comments

    Can I please suggest additional FCU features? In the add contact sections, is there a way to default the Country/Region to United States so we don’t have to select it every time? I understand that partners no longer have to add ourselves to the assignment to make updates, however is there a way for Microsoft to add & default the partner contact name based on who submitted the CPOR claim? And then if someone else needs to be listed we can change it?

  • 2

    1-hour timeout in FTOP

    Suggested by LeeAnne Hughes – Rejected  – 2 Comments

    The new 1-hour timeout feature in FTOP is a killer.  I understand the security reason behind this change, but the timeout session is just too short; same w/ the PBI timeout session.  Is it possible to have the timeout sessions for both FTOP & PBI extended to at least 2 hours?  

  • 2

    API Access to FTOP

    Suggested by Andrew McDonald – Completed  – 1 Comments

    It would be nice to see API access in to the FTOP and deeper reporting web tools, to allow partners to extract and manipulate the data.

  • 2

    Granularity access option for the OSU M365 insights and recommended actions

    Suggested by Robert Bucur – Completed  – 0 Comments

    On Partner Center, the OSU M365 insights, the recommended actions per each workloads, as well as what workloads are claimed per each tenant provide very useful information for technical people engaged with the customer.
    Currently there is no granularity that would enable us to provide access only to specific data, or to specific customer tenants or workloads for OSU Incentive program. We need to assign the "Incentive user" role ("incentive read only role" is not enough). This provides too much insights to our technical people that need only usage insights and customer status and do not require access to all other different Incentive programs, payments etc. or receiving any notifications regarding other incentive programs.
    A granular assignment of roles to specific people at service or tenant level in Partner Center would help. Also the ability to assign only specific customers to specific technical engineers from our company.
    Also a log activity with filters and access roles assigned to personnel would be of help. We like to assign responsibilities to persons on a workload - customer basis In FTOP it is possible to do this when the engineer or FastTrack partner Program Manager contact is associated on the customers tenant level. This feature would be useful to have in CPOR also.

  • 2

    OLM-MAM full access to report

    Suggested by Sebastian Baca – Completed  – 1 Comments

    OLM-MAM report is currently not reporting on ALL tenants and a lot of tenants are missing (even though we have CPOR records correctly assigned).

    We NEED visibility into usage for OLM-MAM for ALL of our tenants in FTOP. 

  • 1

    Add estimated Finacial earnings in partner Centre.

    Suggested by Lerato Vilakazi – Completed  – 0 Comments

     

    Adding estimated earnings in partner center is important for fasttrack ready partners for several reasons. First, it helps partners to track their progress and performance against their goals and expectations. By adding their estimated earnings, partners can see how much they have earned, how much they are eligible to earn, and how much they need to earn to reach the next level of incentives. This can help them to plan their sales and marketing strategies, identify opportunities and challenges, and optimize their cloud business.

    Second, it helps Microsoft to provide better support and guidance to partners. By adding their estimated earnings, partners can share their feedback and insights with Microsoft on the fasttrack program, the cloud solutions, and the customer needs and preferences. This can help Microsoft to improve the quality and relevance of the fasttrack benefits and resources, tailor the communication and engagement with partners, and address any issues or concerns that partners may have.

    Third, it helps to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the incentive payments. By adding their estimated earnings, partners can verify that their earnings are correctly calculated and reported, and that they match the actual customer adoption and usage of the cloud solutions. This can help to avoid any discrepancies or disputes that may arise between partners and Microsoft, and to ensure that partners receive their incentives on time and in full.

    Therefore, adding estimated earnings in partner center is a crucial step for fasttrack ready partners to maximize their benefits and grow their cloud business. It is also a way for partners to demonstrate their commitment and alignment with Microsoft's vision and strategy for the cloud. We encourage all fasttrack ready partners to add their estimated earnings in partner center as soon as possible, and to update them regularly as their business evolves.

  • 1

    Fast Track Portal - is unsigned

    Suggested by Stefan Haffner – Accepted  – 2 Comments

    When accessing the portal you have to give permissions and get a screen that tells you to approve the permissions request for the app from an unverified publisher. I would be great if Microsoft could ensure that the Portal is coming from a verified publisher. A security conscious organization might not be happy with allowing access to apps from un unverified publisher.

  • 1

    MCI workshop approvals and exceptions

    Suggested by John Francis – Rejected  – 0 Comments

    the engine that you run behind the scenes when we as partners submit a client for workshop eligibility is great.. but when it comes back with a workshop as being ineligbile, it would be great if partners could submit for an exception to the rejection.  sometimes the numberic analysis you do and the customer requirements dont make good sales sense.. for example, we couldnt get a client a Secuirty worshiop for intune deployement because they didnt have any exchange installed... well they are a gmail client, and want to deploy intune first, and then eventually move gmail over... 
     
    would be great if we as partners could submit our own exceptions
Suggest a new idea
    Please sign in to provide feedback in this idea forum.

    Search Ideas